top of page
Search

When Inclusion Is Only on Paper: Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month and the Myth of the Open Door

  • Writer: tyudelson
    tyudelson
  • 3 days ago
  • 2 min read

March is Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month — a time to recognize the contributions of people with developmental disabilities, challenge the stigmas that diminish their lives, and recommit to building communities where everyone truly belongs. It is a moment to celebrate. It is also a moment to be honest.


Awareness, by itself, changes nothing. What changes things is accountability — the willingness to look clearly at the gap between what institutions say about inclusion and what they actually do when a disabled person shows up and asks to be let in.


That gap is on full display in a recent investigative piece in The Walrus, which documents how Canadian universities — institutions that publicly champion equity, diversity, and inclusion — routinely obstruct, delay, and deny the disability accommodations that students and employees are legally entitled to under human rights law. The stories it tells are uncomfortable, and they should be.


Permission Structures in Practice

At The Human Dignity Project, we return often to the concept of permission structures — the signals, explicit and implicit, that leaders send about what behaviours are acceptable. When accommodation is framed as a generous gift rather than a legal right, when disabled employees are treated as "problems" rather than colleagues, when bureaucratic processes are designed to outlast the people they are supposed to serve, those are permission structures. They communicate clearly that disability is an inconvenience to be managed, not a human experience to be respected.


The data reflects this culture. Twenty-seven percent of Canadians over fifteen identify as disabled, yet only 6.7 percent of university faculty and researchers are disabled, and less than 10 percent of Canada Research Chairs go to disabled scholars. These are not coincidences. They are outcomes — the predictable result of systems that perform inclusion without practicing it.


As disability studies scholar Jay Dolmage observes in The Walrus piece: "The system is effectively telling disabled staff and faculty not to seek help. And we are losing them."


What Awareness Requires of Us

Developmental Disabilities Awareness Month asks us to be aware. But awareness that does not lead to action is just another form of looking away.


If you work in or with an institution, ask some direct questions. What does your accommodation process look like in practice, not just on paper? Are the people administering it trained in disability rights, or making judgment calls based on their own assumptions?

What messages are your leaders sending — through language, priorities, and budget — about whether disabled people genuinely belong?


A community serious about human dignity does not make people beg for access. It builds access in from the beginning — not as a favour, not as a risk to be managed, but as a straightforward acknowledgment that people are different, and that difference is not a problem to be solved.


That is what this month is for. Not to celebrate awareness. To build something better.

 
 
 

Comments


Better Together
Better together

© 2023 by HUMAN DIGNITY    Proudly created with Wix.com

​Find us: 

Abbotsford, British Columbia  |  CANADA  V2T 5T3

bottom of page